The NCIP-issued
titles in Baguio are currently the focus of attention of the local government, a
Congressional inquiry and concerned citizens of Baguio both the pro and
otherwise.
It's
hard to pick a side for everyone has his own right. While it maybe is true that
many of the Ibalois were displaced during the American time, there were also
records saying some of those lots were sold by the original settlers. It maybe
is biased to the Halsemas coz some of the accounts was written by James
Halsema, son of Eusebius Halsema who was the Mayor of Baguio for 15
years.
In his
book, he said that to create roads, Mayor Halsema had to purchase farm lots but
the Ibalois don't value money so much then so instead accepted as
payments carabaos, a very useful beast of burden for their main livelihood
which is farming. It is also a symbol of affluence.
Probably
some of them were forced to sell their farms and was probably the reason why
Halsema was called "Busol" by some of the original Ibalois. (Busol was
used then to describe a mean man although in some accounts, Halsema was described a humble man.)
We are
not sure if there were papers signed during those sale of lots. If there were, where
can we find these records or were they destroyed during the war. It was
during the time of Mayor Halsema (1921 - 1935) that the presidential proclamation
declaring some part of Baguio, including the current site of the Casa Vallejo, a
Government Center. (Proclamation No. 63, series of 1925 signed by
Governor General Leonard Wood)
There
are other locations reserved as parks, government centers and others are considered alienable and disposable. We can only assume that some of these disposable lands were not
bought by the government that time since most are pasturelands and the creation
of a city would have probably drove the Ibalois farther away from the city to
find better pasture for their herds.
When development
came, the Ibalois then (except Mateo Cariño) didn't know how to claim their
rights to their lands. In our laws, ignorance is no excuse and if you don't
know the law, it's your fault. It's a hard fact that all of us is forced to accept.
It's the same with these land claims. Our Ibaloi forebears left their lands pushed away by the creation of a busy
metropolis and their abandoned lands looked upon by the government as neglected
or deserted and claimed ownership following the Regalian Doctrine, then came the American Torrent system of distributing lands (someone
correct me here if I'm wrong).
On July 22, 1915, the Americans issued a notice to the people claiming lands inside the reservation to file within the next 6 months their respective claims. On November 13 that same year, Judge C. M. Villareal made a ruling declaring all lands within the Baguio Townsite reservation as public lands except for lands reserved for specific public purposes and lands claimed and adjudicated as private properties.
Many of
the unclaimed disposable lands were sold to migrants. While some were passed on to
different hands, many of the original buyers or their families still live in their purchased lands. Of course those settlers have their own rights too having bought those lots
legally. It would be a hard battle to claim them as ancestral domains, although
there are areas currently in dispute between claimants and current owners.
It is probably easier to claim the protected lands since no private owners will defend
them, only the government. But let's just say these claimants win and they will take over those protected lands. The forest reserves (Busol and others),
the parks (Forbes Park, Burnham, etc.), the government centers (Casa Vallejo,
City hall, Convention center, etc), what will become of Baguio? We are already facing gigantic problems
with our current population and buildings, how much more when those remaining
spaces become residential and commercial areas. We will have chaotic city with
not enough water supply and clean air to breathe in the coming years.
The
Government may argue that without the City development, we probably
would not have progressed here in the highlands. The value of the land we are
so zealous to claim today would not have increased as much. We probably did not
become a center of civilization and owning those lands wouldn't have been as valuable.
The migrants are one of the main reasons why Baguio is now a valuable City. But
to the claimants, what good is civilization if the supposed original owners are
discarded from it?
The
claimants have their rights, but we have to balance also how our lands will be
used because in the end it will affect us all, yet the claimants should not be
discarded aside. Let us not forget the fact that they owned these lands long
before us and they have been discriminated being ignorant to the foreign laws.
So how
can this dilemma be solved? Does the government still have disposable lands to give
in substitute to the claims? Are the heirs willing to accept it or perhaps
accept compensations instead? Or if granted, are the heirs willing to
follow the land use plan of the city and utilize those properties accordingly
so as not to worsen the urbanization problems of the City? Will the claimants
and the government willing to meet halfway?
If we
are not willing to bargain, our time will just be consumed between these
battles for land claims that are being questioned even by the very office who
issued those titles. It has also become a battle between government agencies
and offices. Even the IPRA is being questioned by many sectors.
MateoCariño's claim won in an American court on February 23, 1909, years after he
died, and the case now known as the Cariño Doctrine earned international recognition and used as an example by indigenous peoples fighting for their rights worldwide. But even after winning the
court battle, those lands were not returned back to the family of Cariño until
now.
So when
will this end? Probably until the next generation of claimants, probably never.